n unusual oddity of corn growth and development has been reported in scattered fields throughout at least Indiana, Illinois, and Iowa in recent weeks.Years ago, I labeled this oddity a MESS (aka Multiple Ears on Same Shank) that was usually found only in the occasional corn plant along the edges of a field (Nielsen, 1999). This year, the oddity can be more accurately characterized as a problem because of the high percentages of plants affected in some fields.
Multiple ears on a single plant are not unusual, but the multiple ears usually develop separately from individual stalk nodes (Image 1). The oddity/problem being reported this season is one of multiple ears that originate from individual nodes on a single ear shank (Images 2, 6).
First Comment: The fact that multiple ears can develop from a single ear shank in and of itself is not unusual. The ear shank is essentially a replica of the main stalk of the plant. The ear shank develops leaves like the main stalk. These husk leaves originate from individual nodes of the shank like the main leaves develop from individual stalk nodes. The ear shank terminates with a reproductive organ (the female ear) somewhat akin to the main stalk terminating with a reproductive organ (the male tassel). Additional ear shoots can develop from individual nodes of the ear shank (Image 4) like additional ear shoots that develop from individual nodes of the main stalk (Image 1).
Second Comment: Normally the ear shank does not initiate these secondary ears or ears initiate but eventually cease development likely due to apical dominance from the apical ear (Image 5).
Third Comment: What is unusual this year is the occurrence of a "bouquet" effect of 3 to 5 ears or more developing from an individual ear shank (Image 6). Furthermore, and particularly disconcerting to growers, in many cases none of the multiple ears successfully pollinate and set kernels. In some cases, all of the multiple cobs are severely stunted as well. Where kernel set is nonexistent or very limited, the affected plants eventually turn red/purple in response to excessive photosynthate concentration in the leaves and stalk tissues. In some situations, as much as 30 to 50% of the plants in an area of a field are affected. Obviously, the yield loss in these severe situations will be dramatic.
Fourth Comment: The cause of this "bouquet" effect of multiple ears is not known. Some of us have been trying to compile background information from affected fields, but the number of affected fields has admittedly (and thankfully) been few. To my knowledge, there has yet been no single common thread identified among the affected fields. What I suspect is that a) some hybrids are genetically prone to developing multiple ears on a single ear shank and b) more than one external "trigger" enables the development of multiple ears to occur on these hybrids. Identifying the "trigger(s)" is the challenge.
For example, the "bouquet" effect is showing up in one of three hybrids I am using this year in my planting date demo plots at the Crop Diagnostic Training Center near West Lafayette (i.e., a hybrid apparently prone to multiple ears). Furthermore, the "bouquet" effect is more prevalent and severe in later planted plots where silk clipping by rootworm beetles prevented kernel set on the primary ear (i.e., possibly minimizing or negating apical dominance against secondary ears).
Final Comment: If you find this problem in your field, please contact me (rnielsen@purdue.edu) and share the relevant background information of the field with me.
Nielsen, R.L. (Bob). 1999. What A MESS! Corny News Network, Purdue Univ. Online at http://www.agry.purdue.edu/ext/corn/news/articles.99/990823b.html [URL verified 12 Sep 2006].
© 2006 , Purdue University, an equal access, equal opportunity university. This material may be available in alternative formats. If you have trouble accessing this page because of a disability, please contact RLNielsen at rnielsen@purdue.edu.