If you would like to receive Corny News Network articles and other corny information
by email, contact RL (Bob) Nielsen.
Other Corny News Network articles can be viewed at the CNN
Archives.
Published 9 July
2003
Rain, Hail, Wind: What Next?
requent and heavy rainfall in recent days has caused
record and near-record flooding of rivers, creeks, and streams throughout much
of Indiana. Large ponded areas exist in fields distant from floodwaters. The
rains have often been accompanied by damaging winds and hail that have caused
additional damage to the states corn, soybean, and wheat crops. The
consequences to grain yield and quality from the damage caused by the
flooding/ponding and wind are difficult to pinpoint with much accuracy because
little research exists that addresses these chance-occurring yield-limiting
factors. Risks and expectations, however, can be outlined.
Click on image to view larger
popup version.
- Rules of thumb suggest that corn and soybean crops inundated by standing water may only
survive a few days with the 90-degree temperatures that have been prevalent
during this epic rainfall episode. Oxygen deprivation quickly results in
significant deterioration and death of above- and below-ground plant tissue.
- Further physical crop
damage (soil erosion, washing away of plants, lodging of
plants, and plant tissue damage) occurs from the force of the flowing water on
land adjacent to flooded creeks and rivers as well as from any debris caught up
in the floodwaters.
- Severe lodging of wheat
yet unharvested will result in yield loss due to mechanical harvesting
difficulties and/or reduction in grain quality due to weathering and sprouting
of grain (Lipps et al. 2003). The quality of wheat straw harvested from these
ponded areas will also be lower.
- Deposits of sediment and crop
residues often remain on crop plants once the water recedes
that either outright smother any surviving plants or greatly reduce their
ability to capture sunlight and photosynthesize carbohydrates.
- Mud and crud that cakes the leaves and stalks encourage subsequent
development of fungal and bacterial
diseases in damaged plant tissue. When Deer Creek (Carroll
County) flooded severely in August of 1998, adjacent fields of corn that were
in the initial stages of pollination subsequently developed severe bacterial
ear rots following inundation by flood waters at or above the ear level of the
plants (Nielsen & Ruhl, 1998).
- Crops that survive less severe bouts of ponding and saturated soils
will nonetheless suffer significant damage to
their root systems. The immediate effects will be stunting of
plant development. In the longer term, root systems compromised by ponding and
saturated soils now will be less able to sustain the crops IF drought
conditions would develop later in the growing season.
- For corn, damage to its root system now will predispose the crop to
the development of root and stalk
rots later by virtue of the photosynthetic stress imposed by
the limited root system during the important grain filling period following
pollination. Monitor affected fields later in August for the possible
development of stalk rots and modify harvest-timing strategies accordingly.
- Loss of soil nitrate nitrogen in saturated soils due to denitrification or leaching processes is
undoubtedly occurring at significant rates. Estimates of nitrate-N loss due to
waterlogged soil conditions are at least five percent per day given the current
warm soil temperatures (Hoeft, 2002). Many cornfields in the affected area are
still in their rapid growth phase prior to pollination when nitrogen uptake
rates are at their peak. Consequently, some of these fields currently enduring
soggy soil conditions may ultimately develop nitrogen deficiency symptoms
without additional fertilizer applications. Where estimated nitrogen loss is
significant (60 lbs or greater) in fields not yet tasseling and yield potential
is still reasonable, corn may respond to an additional 50 80 lbs of
applied fertilizer N up to or shortly after tasseling (Hoeft, 2001).
- Assessing the effects of hail
damage to corn can be challenging. Important factors include the
amount of defoliation and stalk bruising caused by the hail stones relative to
the growth stage of the crop. While hail damage can result in severe yield
losses in corn, most of the time the human eye perceives greater damage than
truly exists. Browse the two references listed below (Nielsen, 2001; Vorst,
1993) on hail damage assessment for more information.
- Wind damage to corn has occurred
either as stalk breakage (aka green snap) or root lodging (plants
uprooted and laying nearly flat to the ground). The yield effect of green
snap damage depends on the percentage of field affected and whether the
stalk breakage occurs above or below the ear, but is usually serious
regardless. Obviously, stalk breakage below the ear results in zero yield for
that plant. Stalk breakage above the ear results in significant yield loss due
to the loss of upper canopy photosynthesis capacity for that plant. Root lodged
corn will recover or straighten up to varying degrees depending on the growth
stage of the crop. Generally, younger corn has a greater ability to straighten
up with minimal goose-necking than older corn. Yield effects of
root lodging depend on whether soil moisture remains adequate for root
regeneration, the severity of root damage due to the uprooting nature of root
lodging, and the degree of goose-necking that develops and its
effect on the harvestability of the crop.
Related References
Hoeft, Robert. 2001. Nitrogen Loss Update. Univ. of Illinois Pest
& Crop Bulletin (6/22/01). Online at
http://www.ag.uiuc.edu/cespubs/pest/articles/200113g.html
[URL verified 7/9/03].
Hoeft, Robert. 2002. Predicting/Measuring Nitrogen Loss. Univ. of
Illinois Pest & Crop Bulletin (5/17/02). Online at
http://www.ag.uiuc.edu/cespubs/pest/articles/200208n.html
[URL verified 7/9/03].
Lipps, Pat, Jim Beuerlein, and Dennis Mills. 2003. Potential
Wheat Harvest Problems Caused by Persistent Rain. Ohio State Univ.
C.O.R.N. (7/7-13/03). Online at
http://corn.osu.edu/archive/2003/jul/03-21.html
[URL verified 7/9/03].
Nielsen, Bob. 2001. Hail Damage in Corn: Moving Beyond Grief to
Damage Assessment. Purdue Univ. Online at
http://www.kingcorn.org/news/articles.01/Hail_Damage-0606.html
[URL verified 7/9/03].
Nielsen, Bob and Gail Ruhl. 1998. Bacterial Ear Rot in Flooded
Corn. Purdue Univ. Online at
http://www.kingcorn.org/news/articles.98/p&c9828.html
[URL verified 7/9/03].
Thomison, Peter. 2001. Weather Conditions Favorable for "Green
Snap". Ohio State Univ. C.O.R.N. (6/18024/01). Online at
http://corn.osu.edu/archive/2001/jun/01-18.html#linkc
[URL verified 7/9/03].
Vorst, Jim. 1993. Assessing Hail Damage to Corn. Purdue Univ.
Extension Publication NCH-1. Online at
http://www.agcom.purdue.edu/AgCom/Pubs/NCH/NCH-1.html
[URL verified 7/9/03].
For
other information about corn, take a look at the Corn Growers' Guidebook
at http://www.kingcorn.org.
©2003, Purdue University,
all rights reserved. It is the policy of the Purdue
Agronomy Department that all persons shall have equal opportunity
and access to its programs and facilities without regard to race, color,
sex, religion, national origin, age, or disability. Purdue University is an Affirmative Action
employer. This material may be available in alternative formats.
End of document